Claro vs SANS Security Awareness
SANS Security Awareness brings the training authority of the SANS Institute and a deep, expert-curated content library. Claro is an Indonesia-first human-risk platform: bilingual, compliance-mapped, multi-channel simulation, and deployable on-premise.
SANS is one of the most trusted names in security training, and SANS Security Awareness extends that credibility to the whole workforce. Its library spans more than 50 expert-curated modules across multiple tracks, translated into many languages, with phishing tests, just-in-time training, and role-based programs. For organizations that value content depth and the SANS brand, it is a respected choice.
Where the fit narrows is local specialization. SANS content is authored for a global audience and organized around general security awareness, risk, and compliance pillars. It is excellent educational material, but it is not tuned to Indonesian regulators, and its simulation and platform capabilities are more content-led than channel-broad.
Claro takes a platform-first approach for Southeast Asia. It combines email, voice, and WhatsApp simulation with a GrapeJS template and landing-page builder, built-in micro-module training, gamification, and per-user risk scoring, then maps reporting directly to OJK POJK 11/2022, UU PDP, and BSSN. Bahasa Indonesia is native throughout, SCORM import lets you bring external courseware if you license it, and the platform can be deployed on-premise or as SaaS on the same codebase.
If your program is content-first and you want the depth of SANS-authored material for a global audience, SANS is hard to beat on pedigree. If you need an integrated, bilingual platform that produces Indonesian compliance evidence and simulates local attack channels, Claro is built for that job.
Side by side
| Capability | Claro | SANS Security Awareness |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia and SEA localization | Purpose-built for Indonesia and Southeast Asia, from templates and lures to the reporting language auditors expect | Global training content; authoritative but not tuned to Indonesian regulatory context |
| Bahasa Indonesia content | Native English and Bahasa Indonesia at parity from day one, across simulations, training, and the admin console | Modules translated into 30+ languages including Bahasa Indonesia |
| OJK, BSSN, and UU PDP reporting | Reporting mapped to OJK POJK 11/2022, UU PDP, BSSN, and ISO 27001, ready to hand to auditors and boards | Covers general compliance topics; not pre-mapped to OJK, BSSN, or UU PDP specifically |
| Simulation breadth (email, vishing, WhatsApp) | Email, voice (vishing), and WhatsApp phishing simulation, plus a GrapeJS template and landing-page builder | Configurable phishing tests, primarily email, alongside its training tracks |
| Training modules | Built-in micro-module training, just-in-time awareness pages, and gamification that reward secure behavior | Deep, expert-curated library of 50+ modules from SANS subject-matter experts, a core strength |
| Risk scoring | Per-tenant, per-user risk scoring that ties simulation, reporting, and training outcomes into one view | Progress tracking and reporting; risk scoring is lighter than a dedicated HRM platform |
| Deployment (on-prem or SaaS) | On-premise or SaaS on the same codebase, so regulated teams can keep data inside their own environment | Delivered as SaaS |
| Pricing transparency | Straightforward pricing discussed directly with our Southeast Asia team, sized to your headcount | Subscription based on users and selected modules |
| Support and onboarding | Southeast Asia based team, in-region timezone, and hands-on onboarding in English or Bahasa Indonesia | Global support backed by the SANS Institute |
Why teams in Indonesia choose Claro
Integrated platform, not just content
Claro combines simulation, training, gamification, and risk scoring in one system rather than a content catalog you assemble around. You run the whole program in one place instead of coordinating several tools.
Indonesian compliance evidence
Reporting maps to OJK POJK 11/2022, UU PDP, and BSSN, ready for local auditors and boards. General compliance education is useful, but mapped evidence is what regulators ask for.
Bahasa Indonesia at parity
Every module and simulation is native in Bahasa Indonesia, not a translation layer over global content. The tone and examples fit the local workplace, which keeps learners engaged.
Broader simulation
Claro simulates email, WhatsApp, and voice, matching how staff are actually targeted in Indonesia. Content depth is only useful if the tests reflect real attack channels.
On-premise deployment
Keep all data inside your own environment, the model many Indonesian banks and agencies require. The same platform runs on-premise or as SaaS, so you choose without compromise.
Behavior over completion
Per-user risk scoring and just-in-time awareness measure real change, not only module completion rates. You can show risk trending down, not just courses being finished.
This comparison reflects Claro's understanding of publicly available information as of 2026 and our own product. Competitor capabilities change over time, so verify current details with each vendor. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. SANS is strongest as an expert content library, while Claro is a full platform that adds multi-channel simulation, per-user risk scoring, native Bahasa Indonesia, and Indonesian compliance reporting. Teams that need integrated tooling and local evidence often prefer Claro.
Ready to compare in your own environment?
Our team can run a tailored walkthrough against your requirements.
Request a demo